Moving on
The musings of a Kansan serving Christ in the heart of Russia.
Praise God we have a new computer. Our last one just died one day. Well, it has been dying a slow death for a while, but it kept working so we though we could make it last to summer. But then it finally wouldn't turn on. Fortunately we got a loner for a bit, and now purchased a new Toshiba from a guy who had picked it up for a friend and then the friend didn't need it. It's pretty good, but it's a Vista box, so I'm having some adjustments. My pet peeves so far are as follows:
Labels: Geek
Powered by ScribeFire.
"They're stealing my heat and converting it into evil." -Starslip Crisis
Someone we know recently told us about some problem with their church. It was something that really got them down, a sense of apathy among the members. No, not so much an "I don't care" attitude but a "I'm fine right here" attitude. It's very discouraging for them, and I can understand why. Imagine at the age of 10 stating you were fine where you were and never going to grow any, develop any, change any. That's about what that amounts to, staying perpetually as a child. Because that's where we are, we are children, and to simply want to stay where you're at is not wanting to grow.
A recent discussion along with reading of Josh McDowell’s “Right from Wrong” brought something interesting to my mind. That is the inherent hypocrisy that relativists have, and yet don’t realize it. Relativists believe there is no absolute truth, and seem to almost thrive on arguing that with anyone. Yet, for them believe that there are two problems inherent in relativism. First, to believe that there is no absolute truth is contradicting, because you are in fact believing in an absolute truth…that there is no absolute truth. My mind kind of rebels over that, being that it’s circular, and self-contradicting, but that’s how it is. To believe there is no absolute truth is to acknowledge that you believe something that applies to everyone everywhere, that is, there is nothing that is true for everyone, what is true for that person may not be true for another, which is an inherent belief in a contradictory absolute.
The second fallacy is that a relativist can not debate someone and maintain their position. You see, if you truly believe in relative truth, then you can not ever say the other person is wrong. After all, you believe in relative truth, so I am right for me. You can never say someone else is wrong, lest you contradict yourself, because to state so is to say some other form of truth that is absolute. If I believe you’re wrong, you can’t even argue with me there, because that may be what’s true to me. You can’t argue tolerance, because intolerance for others could be my truth. You see what I’m getting at?
No one truly believes in relative morality, they just like to argue it. In practice, most everyone believes in some sort of absolute truth, if only “Live and let live,” which seems to be what most people really mean by relative truth and morality. And if you disagree, you can't argue with me, because this is true to me! :P
I am currently facing large questions about God's call for my life in the immediate future. These questions arise not because of doubting God's call, so much as the arise from the questions in the details involved. There are things about the calling I feel that make me doubtful that make it difficult to bare. And yet I am certain that it is the right way.